Consequences of the Three Rules**
- probabillity something occurs = 1 - the opposite occuring
- There are 5 pokemon in the woods. Catching any is equally likely
- Let \(A\) be the event of catching a pikachu and \(A^c\) be the opposite, catching caterpie, rattata, metapod and weedle
- Since \(A\) and \(A^c\) are cannot both simultaneously occur, they are mutually exclusive. The probabillity that either \(A\) or \(A^c\) is \(P(A) + P(A^c)\). Notice, the probabillity that either occurs is the probabillity of getting a pikachu, caterpie, rattata, metapod or weedle, , or in other words, the probability that something occurs, which is 1 by rule number 2, So we have that \(1 = P(A) + P(A^c)\) or that \(P(A) = 1 - P(A^c)\).
- probabillity of the union of any two sets of outcomes that have nothing in common (mutually exclusive) = sum of their respective probabillities
- for independent events \(A\) and \(B\) (3 or 4), \(P(A \:\cup\: B) = P(A) + P(B)\). read: Let \(A\) be getting a 1 or 2 and \(B\) getting a 3 or 4, probabillity of getting a 1,2,3 or 4 = \(P(A) + P(B)\)
## Warning: package 'png' was built under R version 3.1.3

- if \(A\) implies occurrence of \(B\), then \(P(A)\) occurring \(< P(B)\) occurring
- \(A\) lives inside \(B\), so it makes sense that the probabillity of getting a 1 or 2 (set \(B\)) is larger than the probabillity of getting a 1 (set \(A\))
- Think of it in reverse. If bollywood(\(A\)) is a subset of musicals(\(B\)), the probabillity of people liking musicals or bollywood is larger than someone just liking bollywood.

- for any two events, probability of at least one occurs = the sum of their probabilities - their intersection (in other words, probabilities can not be added simply if they have non-trivial intersection)
non-trivial
= non-mutually exclusive, they can occur together
- in other words, probabillities that are not mutually exclusive can not be simply added
- example: 3% of the American population has sleep apnea. They also report that around 10% of the North American and European population has restless leg syndrome. Does this imply that 13% of people will have at least one sleep problems of these sorts? In other words, can we simply add these two probabilities? Answer: No, the events can simultaneously occur and so are not mutually exclusive. To elaborate let: note*: don’t add probabillities unless the events are mutually exclusive

- for independent events \(A\) and \(B\), \(P(A \:\cup\: B) = P(A) \times P(B)\)
- for outcomes that can occur with different combination of events and these combinations are mutually exclusive, the \(P(E_{total}) = \sum P(E_{part})\)